Category talk:Dates

I think it would be a good idea to merge all the dates into one system. Inconsistencies and differences will be also included. What do I mean?

Pick a certain system: it can be the DC, the KQ2+ or the GC. DC could be more convenient and 'official' but its starting point is not an official source. I think Baggins would prefer GC :)

Let's say we picked well, calculate each date, make addition or subtraction from o GC and add it in that timeline. For example if KQIX says that KQ1 occured about 1600 DC and 0 DC is Daventry's founding, delete these DC articles and make an entry for 1600 BGC to state that Daventry was founded and this year is also known as 0 DC.

I have made a start. There are dual aticles, for example some KQ2+ date aticles say 'This year is equal to the 1400 DC according to the KQIX timeline'. This is not very convenient.

What do we do with inconsistencies? simple. Prefer the official sources, and add a shot reference to the inconsistency. eg. 25 GC: 'KQ6 events according to the official blah blah source. According to the KQIX, these happened 2 years later'. It just requires some time and some maths. I can't do it becaue i am in linux and i don't know it very well so it will be just a pain (no Excel here) but i will help anyway i can. Baggins? what do you say?

-Connor McLyrr